What is the difference between autocorrelation and heteroskedasticity

Therefore, the stronger the correlation, the more difficult it is to hold one variable constant while varying another. It becomes difficult for the model to estimate the effect of each predictor variable on the dependent variable because the independent variables tend to change in unison. Multicollinearity can be problematic if it is severe, such that it increases the variance of the coefficient estimates and makes the estimates very sensitive to minor variations in the model.

The effect of this is that it makes the coefficient estimates very unstable and difficult to use, thus draining the analysis of its statistical and predictive power. A very easy way to detect multicollinearity is to calculate the correlation coefficients for all pairs of independent variables.

If the values are close to either extreme, one of the variables should be removed from the model if possible. Values close to zero 0 suggest a lack of correlation between the predictor variables. Autocorrelation, Homoscedasticity and Multicollinearity are pertinent concepts in data science, especially when performing regression analysis.

Autocorrelation refers to a correlation between the values of an independent variable, while multicollinearity refers to a correlation between two or more independent variables. Homoscedasticity is a case of similar variance in the data. In regression analysis, there is usually the assumption of homoscedasticity and an absence of multicollinearity and autocorrelation.

A violation of these assumptions saps the regression model of its accuracy and predictive powers. It is, therefore, important to verify that these assumptions hold and several tests can help with that. Skip to main content Skip to primary sidebar. This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 1 year, 8 months ago by Oluwole. February 21, at pm Autocorrelation Autocorrelation refers to sample or population observations or variables which are related to each other across space, time or other dimensions.

Types of Autocorrelation Autocorrelation is of two types; positive autocorrelation and negative autocorrelation. Example of Autocorrelation A good example of autocorrelation is the case of taking observations over time. How to detect Autocorrelation Autocorrelation can be detected by plotting the model residuals over time. Homoscedasticity Homoscedasticity is a central theme in linear regression. How to check Homoscedasticity Various tests can be conducted to check if a dataset meets this assumption.

Causes of Multicollinearity Multicollinearity is often the fault of the researcher. It could occur as a result of; Insufficient data — this can be remedied by collecting more data Dummy variables — wrong use of dummy variables to transform categorical data can result in multicollinearity Poorly designed experiments Data that is completely observational Creating new predictor variables Including two identical or almost identical variables, say height in metres and centimetres Including a variable in the regression that is a combination of two other variables, e.

Some of the ways of checking if your model is affected by multicollinearity include; A bivariate correlation greater than 0. Did you try to search the terms in internet? There is no problem. I just waiting for an Explaination. Heteroskedasticity is when two things covary in a different pattern of compactness over the ranges of those two things. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Improve this answer. Isabella Ghement Isabella Ghement In contrast, heteroscedasticity refers to the vact that the variability of Y at the current time is different from the variability of Y at previous times.

I really understand the difference between them. Note that if you talk about one, you cannot talk about the other: if a series is heteroskedastic, then it cannot be weakly stationarity, and so autocorrelation is not defined, if there is serial correlation, you're assuming weak stationarity, and so heteroskedasticity is impossible. Taylor Taylor 18k 2 2 gold badges 30 30 silver badges 65 65 bronze badges. Am I right? Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook.

Sign up using Email and Password. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 20, —9. Hansen, L. Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50, — Forward exchange rates as optimal predictors of future spot rates: an econometric analysis. Journal of Political Economy 96, — Generalized instrumental variables estimation of nonlinear rational expectations models. Hirukawa, M.

A modified nonparametric prewhitened covariance estimator. Journal of Time Series Analysis 27, — Hodrick, R. Dividend yields and expected stock returns: alternative procedures for inference and measurement. Review of Financial Studies 5, — Jansson, M. The error in rejection probability of simple autocorrelation robust tests. Econometrica 72, — Kiefer, N. Heteroskedasticity-autocorrelation robust standard errors using the Bartlett kernel without truncation.

Econometrica 70, —5. A new asymptotic theory for heteroskedasticity-autocorrelation robust tests. Econometric Theory 21, — Simple robust testing of regression hypotheses.

Econometrica 68, — Newey, W. A simple, positive semidefinite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55, — Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. Review of Economic Studies 61, — Phillips, P. Spectral density estimation and robust hypothesis testing using steep origin kernels without truncation.