What kind of hands do men like

A special software developed by the author served to determine distances between manually placed landmarks and compute the required proportions and indices. The location of all landmarks was determined by the author. The length of each finger was taken from its tip to the midpoint of the basal crease Manning et al. The length of the palm was measured from the midpoint of the distal transverse wrist crease to the basal crease of the middle finger Garrett The wrist width was taken at the level of the wrist crease.

The hand width was taken as the distance between the points where proximal and distal transverse flexure creases reach the hand contour see Bayer and Gray The width of the middle finger was taken at the level of proximal interphalangeal creases. The length of thumb was measured from its tip to the metacarpophalangeal eminence.

The distance from the latter point to the wrist approximated to the length of the first metacarpal Figure 2. Ten proportions were calculated from the abovementioned measurements, 5 of them proving sexually dimorphic Table 1 : female hands possessed more slender palms and digits and a higher 2D:4D ratio cf.

Jakubietz RG et al. Within-sex standard values of each proportion were then computed for each individual hand. The values of the sexually dimorphic proportions were added up yielding the femininity index for each hand all dimorphic features were found to be larger in women.

We also established 3 indices related to joints rather than bones: the inclination of thumb, the span of fingers the distance between tips of index and small finger divided by hand width , and the finger crookedness the degree to which the middle finger is crooked, see Figure 2 for details.

The middle finger was chosen to determine finger crookedness because it is the only finger, which is normally straight Jakubietz RG et al. The numbers in square brackets refer to the measurement numbers in Figures 1 and 2.

Facial measurements were based on 26 landmarks Figure 1. The landmarks have been located according to anthropometric standards Farkas ; however, because of the difficulty in locating jaw angles on a photo, we determined instead points on the face contour at the level of the mouth slit Jones et al. Outer eye corners were obscured by lashes in many photos making their precise location difficult to establish; the landmarks were thus not used in the present study.

Fourteen segments that correspond to popularly perceptible facial traits Figure 1 , Table 1 and also used in many previous studies on facial attractiveness e. Lengths of these segments were divided by the interpupillary distance to correct them for overall size of the face Jones et al. Furthermore, we calculated 4 quotient indices, which have been previously reported to impact on facial attractiveness Chang and Chou ; see Table 1 for details.

Values of bilateral traits were averaged in pairs. From 18 facial features in total, 9 proved to be sexually dimorphic Table 1. One of them, brow thickness, is a feature under substantial cosmetic control; it was therefore omitted in the calculation of facial femininity and averageness because these indices were intended to reflect natural facial shape.

All assessments were averaged across the raters yielding single estimates of attractiveness and other rated features for each hand and face.

To reduce the number of variables, mascara, eye shadow, and eyeliner were added together, producing a variable further referred to as eye makeup. For the same reason, values indicating the presence of varnish and the presence of colored varnish were added together, producing a measure of varnish prominence.

To assess reliability of landmark location, 10 male and 10 female hands and faces were randomly selected, and the author placed the landmarks once again several months after initial placement.

Test—retest correlation coefficients for 10 hand proportions varied 0. Thus, the location of the landmarks was proved to be reliable. Averageness of hand and face reached normality after log transformation. Because visual inspection of normality plots revealed that the departures from normality were not strong, we were justified in using multiple linear regression analysis to determine the unique contributions of hand and facial features to attractiveness ratings Hays Finger crookedness of 1 woman that was recorded as All analyses were conducted using Statistica StatSoft 8.

Bivariate analysis revealed many significant correlations between attractiveness of face and dorsal and ventral sides of the hand and measured and assessed features of the face or hand, respectively Table 2. Combining these results with the abovementioned determinants for hand and face attractiveness, one can identify the factors responsible for the relationship between hand attractiveness and face attractiveness. These are averageness and fattiness in men and grooming, and, perhaps, fattiness in women.

The mediation of fattiness in the hand—face attractiveness association in women is uncertain because the impact of fattiness on hand attractiveness in women was significant only in bivariate analysis, not in multiple regression. Structural equation modeling leads to the same conclusions see Supplementary Data. Facial attractiveness was shown to be dependent on geometrical averageness and femininity, perceived skin healthiness, perceived fattiness, mouth positivity in both sexes, use of facial beauty products in women, and facial hair in men, concurring with the results from previous studies Von Fauss ; Cash et al.

Determinants of hand attractiveness were to a large degree analogous to those of facial attractiveness. Averageness increased attractiveness of the ventral side in both sexes and possibly the dorsal side in men, femininity enhanced attractiveness of the dorsal only in women and ventral side at least in women , perceived skin healthiness being beneficial to hand attractiveness but only for the dorsal view in women, perceived fattiness was detrimental for attractiveness for the dorsal view at least in men, and grooming specifically, varnish prominence able to predict attractiveness of hand dorsa in women.

In addition, attractiveness of the dorsal side was positively related to appearance of the nail vicinity in both sexes. Variation of non-geometrical hand features, skin quality, fattiness, and the appearance of nail vicinity occurs predominantly on the dorsal side, and so these features usually predicted attractiveness of the hand dorsum only.

In contrast, geometrical features, such as averageness and femininity, predicted attractiveness mainly in the ventral view where non-geometrical characteristics were less conspicuous. The development of individuals of low genetic quality e. The presently observed relationship between hand averageness and facial averageness in men suggests that both reflect an individual-level developmental stability and possibly also good genes see Thornhill and Grammer ; Little et al.

The female preference for male hand of average shape may thus be an evolutionary adaptation for choosing a partner with good genes Gangestad and Scheyd ; Rhodes In females, however, hand averageness was not related to facial averageness, so averageness of each body part carries a different message if any.

Both men and women may prefer averageness in opposite-sex hands because hand disproportionality may impair its function Young and because hand averageness is a reliable cue to physical health, as some diseases, for example, acromegaly, distort hand proportions Anton The preference for hands of average shape may also be a case of a general preference for exemplars typical for their category, which is an effect of the manner in which the neural system functions Reber et al.

The contention that the averageness of hand shape is a reliable cue to developmental stability and genetic quality in men only may seem unexpected, but it nonetheless accords with theoretical and some of empirical research. As theories of sexual selection predict, in the context of mate choice, good genes and cues to good genes are more important in males than females Geary et al. Lie et al. Rhodes et al. Finally, Gangestad et al. The prominence of sexual features is dependent on the level of sexual hormones, where a high ratio of androgens to estrogens results in a masculine phenotype, whereas a low ratio has a feminizing effect Singh ; Feinberg High androgen-to-estrogen ratio in men and its low values in women are believed to signal good biological quality Singh ; Gangestad and Scheyd ; Feinberg In the present study, however, hand femininity was not associated with facial femininity in any sex, which challenges the claim about a common hormonal basis for the dimorphism of both body parts.

Sign Up Now! Related Questions. Show All. What does it mean when a guy places his hand on a girl's lower back? Why do most guys prefer smaller areolas? Sort Girls First Guys First.

Ro-Tempest Xper 2. Do men like to have a feminine girlfriend? Most do. Is it a big problem? InTimoreDei Yoda. Put nail polish on your hands but still look like a steroid induced dude. Patrickjv Yoda. Nah I prefer hands that can grip a big sword if the need arises. And I'm talking about actual swords you horny retards.

As long as they aren't Freddy kreuger hands we are good. We need a soft comforting touch and delicacy so that we feel comfort which we don't get in the harsh outside world. TadCurious 1. I just saw your question and my answer is "Yes! But it's not always so simple.

Some guys are claspers instead of interweavers when it comes to hand-holding for the record, I'm an interweaver. Other guys think that holding hands is cheesy, or embarrassing, and they're more likely to go for an arm-link. And there's also the chance that he's not ready for public hand-holding yet, but in private he's ready to clutch until your heart's content. It can be a tricky thing to figure out the kind of touching he doesn't like because of comfort level with you versus his comfort with a certain kind of touching, period.

I say, start private and once you're certain, take it to the bar, beach, library, rifle range. Very common for a guy to be all touchy feely when it's just the two of you and not just in private , but to be less so when his pals are around. If this is something that bothers you, bring it up. But I also think it's a good idea, if things are just starting, to give him some time. Yeah, it's immature if he gets squeamish around his pals, but give him a chance to warm up to the idea.

When I fish in the summer, and I first bring a bass into the boat, it goes crazy and it's nearly impossible to touch it at all. But a word to the wise: Anyone who advises you to compare the size of your hand to the size of your face wants you to hit yourself. Smack him in the balls. There are two major factors that could be the cause. It could either be that people with longer fingers which just happens to usually be men are more likely to have longer ring fingers. Or exposure to different levels of sex hormones in utero could be the cause.

Sign up for the Fatherly newsletter to get original articles and expert advice about parenting, fitness, gear, and more in your inbox every day.

Please try again. Give us a little more information and we'll give you a lot more relevant content.